Superwhisper and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Superwhisper: Voice-to-text app for Mac, Windows, and iOS that records and transcribes meetings on-device without a bot, with speaker labels and offline processing. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Superwhisper when transcribing confidential zoom, teams, or meet calls without a bot matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Voice-to-text app for Mac, Windows, and iOS that records and transcribes meetings on-device without a bot, with speaker labels and offline processing.
Automatic speaker labels across longer recordingsAvailable on macOS, Windows, and iOSBot-free meeting recording and transcription captured from the device
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behaviorAutomatic CRM field population and follow-up action generationConversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Superwhisper is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free meeting recording and transcription captured from the device
Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Standout feature
On-device, offline speech recognition that keeps audio local
Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring
Team usage
Automatic speaker labels across longer recordings
Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation
Integrations
File transcription for MP3, MP4, M4A, WAV, and WEBM formats
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior
Languages & capture
Super Mode for dictating recaps and summaries
Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack
Best-fit workflow
System-wide voice typing across applications
Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing
Best for
Superwhisper
Choose Superwhisper if you need transcribing confidential zoom, teams, or meet calls without a bot — strengths include records meetings without adding a visible bot to the call.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Pros & cons
Superwhisper
+ Records meetings without adding a visible bot to the call
+ Offline processing keeps meeting audio off vendor servers
- Primarily a dictation tool, so meeting features are one part of a broader app
Terret
+ Conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics
+ Automates CRM updates and methodology-field population to reduce admin work
- Oriented toward mid-market and enterprise revenue teams rather than small teams
FAQ
Is Superwhisper or Terret better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Superwhisper is strong for transcribing confidential zoom, teams, or meet calls without a bot, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Superwhisper and Terret compare on price?
Superwhisper is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Superwhisper and Terret?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.