Subanana and WhisperLiveKit are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. WhisperLiveKit: Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most, and WhisperLiveKit when self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support.
Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription.
Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Subanana | WhisperLiveKit |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages | Real-time streaming speech-to-text with low latency over WebSocket |
| Standout feature | Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio | Real-time speaker diarization to distinguish multiple speakers |
| Team usage | Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items | FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocol |
| Integrations | Real-time voice transcription with live translation | Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation |
| Languages & capture | Automatic speaker identification | Included customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU) |
| Best-fit workflow | Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt | Voice activity detection and multi-user support on a single backend |
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
WhisperLiveKit
Choose WhisperLiveKit if you need self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels — strengths include fully open source (apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription.
Subanana
WhisperLiveKit
It depends on your workflow. Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams, while WhisperLiveKit is strong for self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades and WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.