SRTGen and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SRTGen: AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist SRTGen when generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI subtitle generation with automatic speaker separation
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Standout feature
Transcription for corporate meetings, conferences, interviews, and research
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Team usage
Export to SRT, VTT, ASS, TXT, DOCX, PDF, and JSON
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Integrations
Translation across a large set of languages and locales
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Languages & capture
Timeline-based subtitle editor with animation and burn-in options
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best-fit workflow
Real-time multi-user collaborative editing
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Best for
SRTGen
Choose SRTGen if you need generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content — strengths include strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
SRTGen
+ Strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows
+ Covers meetings and interviews in addition to social video subtitles
- Primarily oriented toward subtitle files rather than live meeting note-taking
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is SRTGen or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. SRTGen is strong for generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do SRTGen and TeamRetro compare on price?
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both SRTGen and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.