SRTGen and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SRTGen: AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist SRTGen when generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | SRTGen | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI subtitle generation with automatic speaker separation | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Transcription for corporate meetings, conferences, interviews, and research | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Export to SRT, VTT, ASS, TXT, DOCX, PDF, and JSON | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Translation across a large set of languages and locales | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Timeline-based subtitle editor with animation and burn-in options | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Real-time multi-user collaborative editing | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
SRTGen
Choose SRTGen if you need generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content — strengths include strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
SRTGen
Tana
It depends on your workflow. SRTGen is strong for generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.