SRTGen and Scriberr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SRTGen: AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist SRTGen when generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content matters most, and Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI subtitle generation with automatic speaker separation
Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine
Standout feature
Transcription for corporate meetings, conferences, interviews, and research
Automatic speaker diarization (who said what)
Team usage
Export to SRT, VTT, ASS, TXT, DOCX, PDF, and JSON
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers
Integrations
Translation across a large set of languages and locales
Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights
Languages & capture
Timeline-based subtitle editor with animation and burn-in options
Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Best-fit workflow
Real-time multi-user collaborative editing
Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows
Best for
SRTGen
Choose SRTGen if you need generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content — strengths include strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows.
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Pros & cons
SRTGen
+ Strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows
+ Covers meetings and interviews in addition to social video subtitles
- Primarily oriented toward subtitle files rather than live meeting note-taking
Scriberr
+ Fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware
+ MIT-licensed and free to run with no per-minute charges
- Active development was publicly paused by the maintainer, relying on community contributions
FAQ
Is SRTGen or Scriberr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. SRTGen is strong for generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content, while Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do SRTGen and Scriberr compare on price?
SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both SRTGen and Scriberr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.