Spinach and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Spinach: AI meeting assistant for agile teams that helps run standups, takes notes, and creates summaries and tickets. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Spinach when daily standups and sprint planning matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Spinach is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Standout feature
Standup, retro, and planning support
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Team usage
Drafts tickets and updates for project tools
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Integrations
Recording and transcription
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Languages & capture
Integrations with project-management tools
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best-fit workflow
AI notes and summaries for recurring meetings
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Best for
Spinach
Choose Spinach if you need daily standups and sprint planning — strengths include built specifically for agile ceremonies.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
Spinach
+ Built specifically for agile ceremonies
+ Connects meeting outcomes to project tools
- Most valuable for agile/software workflows specifically
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is Spinach or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Spinach is strong for daily standups and sprint planning, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Spinach and TeamRetro compare on price?
Spinach is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Spinach and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.