spf.io and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. spf.io: AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist spf.io when captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | spf.io | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic live captions and translation in 100+ languages, with translated audio in 70+ | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Projector display of up to four languages plus mobile QR/URL attendee access | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, YouTube, OBS, StreamYard, vMix, and Twitch | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Supervised/edited captioning and bidirectional translation modes | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Vocabulary fine-tuning, custom speech recognition, and adapted translation models | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Optional professional captioners, interpreters, and remote operators as add-ons | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
spf.io
Choose spf.io if you need captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices — strengths include very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
spf.io
toruno
It depends on your workflow. spf.io is strong for captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.