Spellar AI and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Spellar AI: A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Spellar AI when sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Spellar AI | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free recording on Mac, iPhone, and iPad | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Transcription in 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Per-meeting model switching across multiple AI providers | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Customizable summary templates with action item extraction | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | On-device transcription or bring-your-own-key options; server-side AI is opt-in | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | One-click export to Notion, Jira, Linear, and Google Docs | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Spellar AI
Choose Spellar AI if you need sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot — strengths include no bot joins the call, keeping capture discreet across platforms.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Spellar AI
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Spellar AI is strong for sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.