SpeechText.AI and Zell are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. Zell: Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most, and Zell when analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio.
Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription.
SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | SpeechText.AI | Zell |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio and video files | Captures and analyzes video, phone, and in-person sales calls |
| Standout feature | Speaker identification across multi-participant recordings | GDPR-compliant on-device transcription without a meeting bot or stored customer data |
| Team usage | Support for 30+ languages with regional accents | Automated scorecards on talk patterns, objection handling, and discovery depth |
| Integrations | Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal | Instant AI call summaries after each conversation |
| Languages & capture | Interactive transcript editing and verification tools | Skill-gap dashboard for managers across reps |
| Best-fit workflow | Natural-language search inside audio recordings | AI coaching, personalized coaching plans, and roleplay simulations |
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
Zell
Choose Zell if you need analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps — strengths include privacy-first design with on-device transcription suited to gdpr-conscious eu teams.
SpeechText.AI
Zell
It depends on your workflow. SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements, while Zell is strong for analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.