SpeechText.AI and Spinach are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. Spinach: AI meeting assistant for agile teams that helps run standups, takes notes, and creates summaries and tickets. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most, and Spinach when daily standups and sprint planning matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio.
AI meeting assistant for agile teams that helps run standups, takes notes, and creates summaries and tickets.
SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Spinach is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | SpeechText.AI | Spinach |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio and video files | AI notes and summaries for recurring meetings |
| Standout feature | Speaker identification across multi-participant recordings | Standup, retro, and planning support |
| Team usage | Support for 30+ languages with regional accents | Drafts tickets and updates for project tools |
| Integrations | Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal | Recording and transcription |
| Languages & capture | Interactive transcript editing and verification tools | Integrations with project-management tools |
| Best-fit workflow | Natural-language search inside audio recordings | AI notes and summaries for recurring meetings |
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
Spinach
Choose Spinach if you need daily standups and sprint planning — strengths include built specifically for agile ceremonies.
SpeechText.AI
Spinach
It depends on your workflow. SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements, while Spinach is strong for daily standups and sprint planning. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Spinach is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.