Speech to Note and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speech to Note: Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speech to Note when transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Speech to Note | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Speech-to-text transcription across 100+ languages | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | Large library of smart note and summary formats | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Custom summary template creation | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Webhook-based workflow automation | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Offline recording on mobile with cross-device sync | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | Multiple output and export formats with privacy controls | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
Speech to Note
Choose Speech to Note if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format — strengths include highly customizable summary formats and templates.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Speech to Note
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. Speech to Note is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.