Speech to Note and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speech to Note: Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speech to Note when transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior
Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation
Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Speech-to-text transcription across 100+ languages
Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale
Standout feature
Large library of smart note and summary formats
Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring
Team usage
Custom summary template creation
Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation
Integrations
Webhook-based workflow automation
AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior
Languages & capture
Offline recording on mobile with cross-device sync
Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack
Best-fit workflow
Multiple output and export formats with privacy controls
Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing
Best for
Speech to Note
Choose Speech to Note if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format — strengths include highly customizable summary formats and templates.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Pros & cons
Speech to Note
+ Highly customizable summary formats and templates
+ Available on web, iOS, and Android rather than a single platform
- Pricing tiers are not displayed on the main landing page
Terret
+ Conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics
+ Automates CRM updates and methodology-field population to reduce admin work
- Oriented toward mid-market and enterprise revenue teams rather than small teams
FAQ
Is Speech to Note or Terret better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speech to Note is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speech to Note and Terret compare on price?
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speech to Note and Terret?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.