Speech to Note and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speech to Note: Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speech to Note when transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Speech-to-text transcription across 100+ languages
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Standout feature
Large library of smart note and summary formats
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Team usage
Custom summary template creation
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Integrations
Webhook-based workflow automation
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Languages & capture
Offline recording on mobile with cross-device sync
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Best-fit workflow
Multiple output and export formats with privacy controls
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best for
Speech to Note
Choose Speech to Note if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format — strengths include highly customizable summary formats and templates.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
Speech to Note
+ Highly customizable summary formats and templates
+ Available on web, iOS, and Android rather than a single platform
- Pricing tiers are not displayed on the main landing page
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is Speech to Note or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speech to Note is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speech to Note and TeamRetro compare on price?
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speech to Note and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Speech to Note vs TeamRetro: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo