Speech to Note and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speech to Note: Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speech to Note when transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Cross-platform tool that converts speech into transcripts and customizable summaries using a large library of note formats.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Speech to Note | TeamRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Speech-to-text transcription across 100+ languages | Action-item tracking carried across sessions |
| Standout feature | Large library of smart note and summary formats | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting |
| Team usage | Custom summary template creation | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes |
| Integrations | Webhook-based workflow automation | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) |
| Languages & capture | Offline recording on mobile with cross-device sync | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time |
| Best-fit workflow | Multiple output and export formats with privacy controls | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities |
Speech to Note
Choose Speech to Note if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format — strengths include highly customizable summary formats and templates.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Speech to Note
TeamRetro
It depends on your workflow. Speech to Note is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings in a chosen format, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Speech to Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.