Speakr and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Speakr | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | System and browser-tab audio capture | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
Speakr
Wave
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.