Speakr and Upmeet are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. Upmeet: French AI meeting assistant that records calls without a bot, transcribes them, and makes meeting knowledge searchable. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and Upmeet when french and european teams needing meeting records hosted in france matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local modelsCustomizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasksMulti-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
French AI meeting assistant that records calls without a bot, transcribes them, and makes meeting knowledge searchable.
Automatic transcription with summaries highlighting decisions and actionsDesktop app records video calls without adding a bot participantFrench data residency with GDPR compliance
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Upmeet is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Desktop app records video calls without adding a bot participant
Standout feature
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
In-person recording and audio file import support
Team usage
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Automatic transcription with summaries highlighting decisions and actions
Integrations
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Searchable meeting memory with an AI agent query interface
Languages & capture
System and browser-tab audio capture
Integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, and Teams
Best-fit workflow
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Industry-specific configurations
Best for
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Upmeet
Choose Upmeet if you need french and european teams needing meeting records hosted in france — strengths include bot-free recording avoids a visible assistant in the meeting.
Pros & cons
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
Upmeet
+ Bot-free recording avoids a visible assistant in the meeting
+ French/EU data residency for privacy-conscious teams
- Bot-free desktop recording depends on the host running the app rather than auto-joining
FAQ
Is Speakr or Upmeet better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while Upmeet is strong for french and european teams needing meeting records hosted in france. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speakr and Upmeet compare on price?
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Upmeet is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speakr and Upmeet?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.