Speakr and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local modelsCustomizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasksMulti-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools.
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualificationAutomated voicemail drops and number-health monitoringCall analytics and performance scoring
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance
Standout feature
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines
Team usage
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring
Integrations
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification
Languages & capture
System and browser-tab audio capture
Call analytics and performance scoring
Best-fit workflow
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot
Best for
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Pros & cons
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
Trellus
+ Adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools
+ Lightweight browser-extension deployment
- Focused on outbound calling rather than full meeting capture
FAQ
Is Speakr or Trellus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speakr and Trellus compare on price?
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speakr and Trellus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.