Speakr and tl;dv are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. tl;dv: Video-first AI meeting recorder with searchable clips, 30+ language transcription, and EU/GDPR-friendly hosting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and tl;dv when teams sharing video highlights matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local modelsCustomizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasksMulti-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); tl;dv is from $18/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Video clips
Standout feature
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
30+ languages
Team usage
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
EU/GDPR hosting
Integrations
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Speaker recognition
Languages & capture
System and browser-tab audio capture
Video clips
Best-fit workflow
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
30+ languages
Best for
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
tl;dv
Choose tl;dv if you need teams sharing video highlights — strengths include free plan with unlimited recording and 30+ language transcription.
Pros & cons
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
tl;dv
+ Free plan with unlimited recording and 30+ language transcription
+ Shareable video clips and timestamps
- Free plan keeps recordings only 3 months and caps AI notes at 10 for the account's lifetime
FAQ
Is Speakr or tl;dv better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while tl;dv is strong for teams sharing video highlights. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speakr and tl;dv compare on price?
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and tl;dv is from $18/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speakr and tl;dv?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.