Speakr and Tactiq are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. Tactiq: Live transcription and AI-summary tool that works as a browser extension for Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and Tactiq when no-bot live transcription in the browser matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local modelsCustomizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasksMulti-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tactiq is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Real-time browser-based transcription
Standout feature
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
AI summaries and action items
Team usage
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Custom AI prompts over transcripts
Integrations
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Works with Meet, Zoom, and Teams
Languages & capture
System and browser-tab audio capture
Export and sharing options
Best-fit workflow
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Real-time browser-based transcription
Best for
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Tactiq
Choose Tactiq if you need no-bot live transcription in the browser — strengths include lightweight browser extension, no meeting bot.
Pros & cons
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
Tactiq
+ Lightweight browser extension, no meeting bot
+ Live transcripts as the meeting happens
- Browser-extension model depends on your browser session
FAQ
Is Speakr or Tactiq better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while Tactiq is strong for no-bot live transcription in the browser. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Speakr and Tactiq compare on price?
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tactiq is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Speakr and Tactiq?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.