Sonix and StreamAlive are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Sonix: Automated transcription service that converts audio and video into searchable text in many languages, with editing tools. StreamAlive: Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Sonix when transcribing recorded meetings matters most, and StreamAlive when running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chat-based audience participation across Zoom, Teams, Meet, and YouTube Live
Standout feature
In-browser transcript editor
AI-powered automatic detection and curation of audience questions
Team usage
Multi-language support
AI generation of ready-to-use polls and interactions from a presentation or topic
Integrations
Translation and subtitles
AI chat summaries with insights and notable quotes
Languages & capture
Search across transcripts
Live polls, word clouds, interactive maps, spinner wheels, and emoji reactions
Best-fit workflow
Automated transcription
Post-session analytics and reports
Best for
Sonix
Choose Sonix if you need transcribing recorded meetings — strengths include accurate transcription with strong editing.
StreamAlive
Choose StreamAlive if you need running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings — strengths include designed specifically for engaging large town hall and all-hands audiences.
Pros & cons
Sonix
+ Accurate transcription with strong editing
+ Wide language coverage
- Not a live meeting bot
StreamAlive
+ Designed specifically for engaging large town hall and all-hands audiences
+ AI question curation helps moderators surface relevant questions during fast chats
- Focused on live engagement rather than transcription or detailed minute generation
FAQ
Is Sonix or StreamAlive better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Sonix is strong for transcribing recorded meetings, while StreamAlive is strong for running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Sonix and StreamAlive compare on price?
Sonix is a free tier with paid upgrades and StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Sonix and StreamAlive?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.