Soniox and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps.
Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changesEnterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPRReal-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs
Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance
Standout feature
Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations
Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines
Team usage
Real-time speech translation across many language pairs
Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring
Integrations
Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification
Languages & capture
Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration
Call analytics and performance scoring
Best-fit workflow
Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot
Best for
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Pros & cons
Soniox
+ Strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings
+ Low-latency real-time streaming suitable for live use
- Delivered as an API rather than a turnkey meeting product
Trellus
+ Adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools
+ Lightweight browser-extension deployment
- Focused on outbound calling rather than full meeting capture
FAQ
Is Soniox or Trellus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Soniox and Trellus compare on price?
Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Soniox and Trellus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.