SmartDepo and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. SmartDepo: AI deposition summary platform for litigators that produces cited summaries with page-line citations. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist SmartDepo when generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
Multiple summary formats: page/line summaries, key admissions, abstracts, and memos
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
Topic detection that organizes content like attorney case materials
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Full-transcript analysis without omissions
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Human review of AI-generated summaries by legal professionals
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Fast turnaround, with summaries produced in minutes
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
SmartDepo
Choose SmartDepo if you need generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts — strengths include citation-focused output suitable for court filings.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
SmartDepo
+ Citation-focused output suitable for court filings
+ Multiple summary formats tailored to different litigation tasks
- Narrowly focused on deposition summaries rather than live transcription or general meetings
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is SmartDepo or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. SmartDepo is strong for generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do SmartDepo and Typist compare on price?
SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both SmartDepo and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.