Skribby and Yating are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. Yating: Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and Yating when students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Taiwan-built AI speech-to-text app for classes, meetings, and interviews, optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Skribby | Yating |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Live microphone transcription plus transcription of recorded and uploaded files |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts | Optimized for Taiwanese-accent Mandarin and Mandarin-English code-switching |
| Team usage | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) | Support for Mandarin, Taiwanese, English, Japanese, and Cantonese |
| Integrations | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events | Speaker identification with timestamps |
| Languages & capture | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support | Subtitle mode for accessibility |
| Best-fit workflow | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings | Cross-platform: mobile, web, and Chrome plugin |
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Yating
Choose Yating if you need students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english — strengths include strong handling of taiwanese-accent mandarin and chinese-english code-switching.
Skribby
Yating
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while Yating is strong for students transcribing lectures and classes in mandarin or mixed mandarin-english. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and Yating is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.