Skribby and Vexa are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. Vexa: API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and Vexa when building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetingsBring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers.
API-first design with REST and WebSocket interfacesData storage with query and export capabilitiesDeployable bots that join meetings via URL to capture audio
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
API-first design with REST and WebSocket interfaces
Standout feature
Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts
Real-time, speaker-diarized transcription with low latency
Team usage
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Deployable bots that join meetings via URL to capture audio
Integrations
Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events
Open-source (Apache 2.0) with self-hosted or managed cloud options
Languages & capture
Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support
Data storage with query and export capabilities
Best-fit workflow
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
Supports Google Meet and Microsoft Teams (Zoom planned)
Best for
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Vexa
Choose Vexa if you need building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product — strengths include programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products.
Pros & cons
Skribby
+ Pay-as-you-go API with no monthly minimums or contracts
+ Provider-agnostic transcription via bring-your-own-key across many engines
- Cloud-only managed service with no self-hosting or open-source option
Vexa
+ Programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products
+ Open-source and self-hostable for control over data and deployment
- Developer-oriented rather than a ready-to-use end-user notetaking app
FAQ
Is Skribby or Vexa better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while Vexa is strong for building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Skribby and Vexa compare on price?
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Skribby and Vexa?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.