Skribby and UMEVO Note Plus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. UMEVO Note Plus: MagSafe AI voice recorder that captures calls and in-person meetings and turns them into transcripts and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and UMEVO Note Plus when recording and summarizing phone calls for later reference matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetingsBring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
MagSafe AI voice recorder that captures calls and in-person meetings and turns them into transcripts and summaries.
Dual recording modes for phone calls and in-person meetingsMagSafe attachment with large onboard storage and long batterySpeaker-separated dialogue and reference-grounded answers
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); UMEVO Note Plus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Dual recording modes for phone calls and in-person meetings
Standout feature
Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts
Vibration-conduction sensor for call capture and air mics for meetings
Team usage
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Transcripts, translations, summaries, and mind maps
Integrations
Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events
Speaker-separated dialogue and reference-grounded answers
Languages & capture
Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support
Support for 140+ languages
Best-fit workflow
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
MagSafe attachment with large onboard storage and long battery
Best for
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
UMEVO Note Plus
Choose UMEVO Note Plus if you need recording and summarizing phone calls for later reference — strengths include captures both phone calls and live meetings in one device.
Pros & cons
Skribby
+ Pay-as-you-go API with no monthly minimums or contracts
+ Provider-agnostic transcription via bring-your-own-key across many engines
- Cloud-only managed service with no self-hosting or open-source option
UMEVO Note Plus
+ Captures both phone calls and live meetings in one device
+ Generates summaries and mind maps, not just raw transcripts
- Requires buying dedicated hardware
FAQ
Is Skribby or UMEVO Note Plus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while UMEVO Note Plus is strong for recording and summarizing phone calls for later reference. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Skribby and UMEVO Note Plus compare on price?
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and UMEVO Note Plus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Skribby and UMEVO Note Plus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.