Skribby and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Skribby | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Skribby
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.