Skribby and Spellar AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. Spellar AI: A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and Spellar AI when sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetingsBring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items.
Bot-free recording on Mac, iPhone, and iPadCustomizable summary templates with action item extractionOn-device transcription or bring-your-own-key options; server-side AI is opt-in
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Bot-free recording on Mac, iPhone, and iPad
Standout feature
Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts
Transcription in 100+ languages with automatic language detection
Team usage
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Per-meeting model switching across multiple AI providers
Integrations
Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events
Customizable summary templates with action item extraction
Languages & capture
Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support
On-device transcription or bring-your-own-key options; server-side AI is opt-in
Best-fit workflow
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
One-click export to Notion, Jira, Linear, and Google Docs
Best for
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Spellar AI
Choose Spellar AI if you need sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot — strengths include no bot joins the call, keeping capture discreet across platforms.
Pros & cons
Skribby
+ Pay-as-you-go API with no monthly minimums or contracts
+ Provider-agnostic transcription via bring-your-own-key across many engines
- Cloud-only managed service with no self-hosting or open-source option
Spellar AI
+ No bot joins the call, keeping capture discreet across platforms
+ Flexible AI model choice and bring-your-own-key support
- Capture relies on running the desktop or mobile app on the user's device
FAQ
Is Skribby or Spellar AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while Spellar AI is strong for sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Skribby and Spellar AI compare on price?
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Skribby and Spellar AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.