Skribby and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Skribby | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Skribby
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.