Simon Says and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Simon Says: AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Simon Says when transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows.
AI transcription with speaker identificationIntegrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and AvidSubtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Subtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Translation across many languages
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Integrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Support for professional audio and video formats
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
AI transcription with speaker identification
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Simon Says
Choose Simon Says if you need transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects — strengths include integrates directly with professional video editing software.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Simon Says
+ Integrates directly with professional video editing software
+ Strong multilingual transcription and translation coverage
- Built for video production rather than meeting note-taking
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Simon Says or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Simon Says is strong for transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Simon Says and Tana compare on price?
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Simon Says and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.