Simon Says and SpeechText.AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Simon Says: AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Simon Says when transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects matters most, and SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows.
AI transcription with speaker identificationIntegrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and AvidSubtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic transcription of uploaded audio and video files
Standout feature
Subtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Speaker identification across multi-participant recordings
Team usage
Translation across many languages
Support for 30+ languages with regional accents
Integrations
Integrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid
Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal
Languages & capture
Support for professional audio and video formats
Interactive transcript editing and verification tools
Best-fit workflow
AI transcription with speaker identification
Natural-language search inside audio recordings
Best for
Simon Says
Choose Simon Says if you need transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects — strengths include integrates directly with professional video editing software.
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
Pros & cons
Simon Says
+ Integrates directly with professional video editing software
+ Strong multilingual transcription and translation coverage
- Built for video production rather than meeting note-taking
SpeechText.AI
+ Domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology
+ EU hosting and GDPR-aligned data residency for privacy-sensitive work
- Works from uploaded recordings rather than joining live meetings
FAQ
Is Simon Says or SpeechText.AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Simon Says is strong for transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects, while SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Simon Says and SpeechText.AI compare on price?
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades and SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Simon Says and SpeechText.AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.