Simon Says and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Simon Says: AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Simon Says when transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Simon Says | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI transcription with speaker identification | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Subtitle and caption generation with visual editing | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Translation across many languages | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Integrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Support for professional audio and video formats | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | AI transcription with speaker identification | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Simon Says
Choose Simon Says if you need transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects — strengths include integrates directly with professional video editing software.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Simon Says
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Simon Says is strong for transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.