Simon Says and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Simon Says: AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Simon Says when transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows.
AI transcription with speaker identificationIntegrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and AvidSubtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Standout feature
Subtitle and caption generation with visual editing
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Team usage
Translation across many languages
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Integrations
Integrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Languages & capture
Support for professional audio and video formats
System and browser-tab audio capture
Best-fit workflow
AI transcription with speaker identification
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Best for
Simon Says
Choose Simon Says if you need transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects — strengths include integrates directly with professional video editing software.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Pros & cons
Simon Says
+ Integrates directly with professional video editing software
+ Strong multilingual transcription and translation coverage
- Built for video production rather than meeting note-taking
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
FAQ
Is Simon Says or Speakr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Simon Says is strong for transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Simon Says and Speakr compare on price?
Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Simon Says and Speakr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.