Shadow and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participantCaptures on-screen content in addition to spoken audioCustomizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
Automatic capture and transcription
Standout feature
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
AI summaries and action items
Team usage
Speaker identification during transcription
Sync notes to docs and task tools
Integrations
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Multi-language support
Languages & capture
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Shareable recaps
Best-fit workflow
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
Automatic capture and transcription
Best for
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Pros & cons
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
timeOS
+ Automates post-meeting follow-up across tools
+ Works across major platforms
- Joins meetings to capture them
FAQ
Is Shadow or timeOS better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Shadow and timeOS compare on price?
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Shadow and timeOS?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.