Shadow and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Shadow | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | On-device (local) transcription on macOS | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Speaker identification during transcription | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Shadow
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.