Shadow and Swiss Transcript are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Swiss Transcript: Swiss audio and video transcription platform hosted entirely in Switzerland, with automatic meeting reports and strong confidentiality. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Swiss Transcript when transcribing confidential meetings for swiss public-sector and healthcare bodies matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participantCaptures on-screen content in addition to spoken audioCustomizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Swiss audio and video transcription platform hosted entirely in Switzerland, with automatic meeting reports and strong confidentiality.
Audio and video transcription with automatic speaker identificationAutomatic generation of structured meeting reportsData processed and hosted entirely in Switzerland with automatic source-file deletion
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Swiss Transcript is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
Audio and video transcription with automatic speaker identification
Standout feature
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
Automatic generation of structured meeting reports
Team usage
Speaker identification during transcription
Multilingual support including French, German, Swiss German and English
Integrations
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Export to Word, PDF, RTF, SRT and VTT formats
Languages & capture
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Data processed and hosted entirely in Switzerland with automatic source-file deletion
Best-fit workflow
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
Audio and video transcription with automatic speaker identification
Best for
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Swiss Transcript
Choose Swiss Transcript if you need transcribing confidential meetings for swiss public-sector and healthcare bodies — strengths include full swiss hosting with gdpr and swiss data protection act compliance.
Pros & cons
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
Swiss Transcript
+ Full Swiss hosting with GDPR and Swiss Data Protection Act compliance
+ Avoids large third-party AI APIs in favor of open-source models
- A public API is noted as a future addition rather than currently available
FAQ
Is Shadow or Swiss Transcript better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Swiss Transcript is strong for transcribing confidential meetings for swiss public-sector and healthcare bodies. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Shadow and Swiss Transcript compare on price?
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Swiss Transcript is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Shadow and Swiss Transcript?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.