Shadow and Subanana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participantCaptures on-screen content in addition to spoken audioCustomizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support.
AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languagesAutomatic speaker identificationMeeting transcription with automated summaries and action items
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages
Standout feature
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio
Team usage
Speaker identification during transcription
Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items
Integrations
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Real-time voice transcription with live translation
Languages & capture
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Automatic speaker identification
Best-fit workflow
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt
Best for
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
Pros & cons
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
Subanana
+ Built for the Hong Kong market with strong Cantonese and code-switching support
+ Covers both subtitling/content workflows and meeting transcription
- Free allowance is limited before requiring a paid plan
FAQ
Is Shadow or Subanana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Shadow and Subanana compare on price?
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Shadow and Subanana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Shadow vs Subanana: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo