Shadow and Stenomatic are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Stenomatic: AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Stenomatic when adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Shadow | Stenomatic |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant | Real-time voice-to-voice interpretation for live events |
| Standout feature | On-device (local) transcription on macOS | Translated live captions and on-screen transcription |
| Team usage | Speaker identification during transcription | Support for a very large set of languages and multi-directional conversations |
| Integrations | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio | No-download attendee access via a branded web link |
| Languages & capture | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails | Custom terminology input for specialized vocabulary |
| Best-fit workflow | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools | API, embeddable widget, and InEvent integration |
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Stenomatic
Choose Stenomatic if you need adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit — strengths include attendees need no app install, just a web link.
Shadow
Stenomatic
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Stenomatic is strong for adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.