Shadow and spf.io are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. spf.io: AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and spf.io when captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
AI captioning and translation platform for in-person, virtual, and hybrid events, supporting 100+ languages with broad streaming integrations.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Shadow | spf.io |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant | Automatic live captions and translation in 100+ languages, with translated audio in 70+ |
| Standout feature | On-device (local) transcription on macOS | Projector display of up to four languages plus mobile QR/URL attendee access |
| Team usage | Speaker identification during transcription | Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, YouTube, OBS, StreamYard, vMix, and Twitch |
| Integrations | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio | Supervised/edited captioning and bidirectional translation modes |
| Languages & capture | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails | Vocabulary fine-tuning, custom speech recognition, and adapted translation models |
| Best-fit workflow | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools | Optional professional captioners, interpreters, and remote operators as add-ons |
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
spf.io
Choose spf.io if you need captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices — strengths include very broad language coverage for both captions and translated audio.
Shadow
spf.io
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while spf.io is strong for captioning and translating large in-person conferences across projectors and mobile devices. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and spf.io is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.