Shadow and Spellar AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Spellar AI: A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Spellar AI when sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participantCaptures on-screen content in addition to spoken audioCustomizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
A bot-free AI meeting note taker for Mac, iOS, and web that records on-device and produces transcripts, summaries, and action items.
Bot-free recording on Mac, iPhone, and iPadCustomizable summary templates with action item extractionOn-device transcription or bring-your-own-key options; server-side AI is opt-in
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
Bot-free recording on Mac, iPhone, and iPad
Standout feature
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
Transcription in 100+ languages with automatic language detection
Team usage
Speaker identification during transcription
Per-meeting model switching across multiple AI providers
Integrations
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Customizable summary templates with action item extraction
Languages & capture
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
On-device transcription or bring-your-own-key options; server-side AI is opt-in
Best-fit workflow
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
One-click export to Notion, Jira, Linear, and Google Docs
Best for
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Spellar AI
Choose Spellar AI if you need sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot — strengths include no bot joins the call, keeping capture discreet across platforms.
Pros & cons
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
Spellar AI
+ No bot joins the call, keeping capture discreet across platforms
+ Flexible AI model choice and bring-your-own-key support
- Capture relies on running the desktop or mobile app on the user's device
FAQ
Is Shadow or Spellar AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Spellar AI is strong for sales reps capturing client calls without a visible bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Shadow and Spellar AI compare on price?
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Spellar AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Shadow and Spellar AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Shadow vs Spellar AI: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo