Shadow and Speechmatics are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Speechmatics: Speech-to-text and voice AI provider offering real-time transcription and live captioning APIs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Speechmatics when adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participantCaptures on-screen content in addition to spoken audioCustomizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
Speech-to-text and voice AI provider offering real-time transcription and live captioning APIs.
APIs for embedding transcription into other applicationsLive captioning for events, broadcasts, and streamsLow-latency real-time processing for live use
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speechmatics is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant
Speech-to-text transcription for recorded and real-time audio
Standout feature
On-device (local) transcription on macOS
Low-latency real-time processing for live use
Team usage
Speaker identification during transcription
Live captioning for events, broadcasts, and streams
Integrations
Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio
Multi-speaker and multilingual support across many languages
Languages & capture
Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails
APIs for embedding transcription into other applications
Best-fit workflow
Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools
Speech-to-text transcription for recorded and real-time audio
Best for
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Speechmatics
Choose Speechmatics if you need adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events — strengths include real-time, low-latency transcription suitable for live captioning.
Pros & cons
Shadow
+ Does not add a visible bot to meetings
+ Local transcription keeps core audio processing on the device
- Available for macOS only
Speechmatics
+ Real-time, low-latency transcription suitable for live captioning
+ Broad language and multi-speaker coverage
- Primarily a developer-facing engine rather than a ready-made app
FAQ
Is Shadow or Speechmatics better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Speechmatics is strong for adding live captions to broadcasts, sports, and events. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Shadow and Speechmatics compare on price?
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speechmatics is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Shadow and Speechmatics?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Shadow vs Speechmatics: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo