Shadow and Soniox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most, and Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Shadow | Soniox |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant | Real-time and asynchronous speech-to-text APIs |
| Standout feature | On-device (local) transcription on macOS | Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations |
| Team usage | Speaker identification during transcription | Real-time speech translation across many language pairs |
| Integrations | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio | Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes |
| Languages & capture | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails | Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration |
| Best-fit workflow | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools | Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR |
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Shadow
Soniox
It depends on your workflow. Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining, while Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades and Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.