Scribewave and ScriptMe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribewave: Scribewave is a European AI transcription platform that converts audio and video into editable text across dozens of languages and dialects, with speaker diarization and an AI assistant for summaries and notes. ScriptMe: Automatic transcription and subtitling tool that processes Zoom, Teams, and GoTo Meeting recordings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribewave when journalists and researchers transcribing and reviewing interviews across multiple languages matters most, and ScriptMe when transcribing and subtitling recorded zoom, teams, or goto meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Scribewave is a European AI transcription platform that converts audio and video into editable text across dozens of languages and dialects, with speaker diarization and an AI assistant for summaries and notes.
AI assistant that answers questions and generates summaries, chapters, and meeting notes with timecodesAI transcription of audio and video files into editable text across many languages and dialectsCustom vocabularies to preserve names, jargon, and domain terms
Scribewave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ScriptMe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI transcription of audio and video files into editable text across many languages and dialects
Automatic transcription of uploaded meeting recordings
Standout feature
Speaker diarization and speaker identification, including handling overlapping speech
Support for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and GoTo Meeting recordings
Team usage
Synchronized editor with click-to-audio word sync for review and correction
Subtitle creation with customizable settings and video export
Integrations
AI assistant that answers questions and generates summaries, chapters, and meeting notes with timecodes
Translation of transcripts into many languages
Languages & capture
Custom vocabularies to preserve names, jargon, and domain terms
Collaborative editing and project sharing
Best-fit workflow
Exports to Word, Google Docs, PDF, and subtitle formats (SRT/VTT), plus captioned video output
Built-in transcript editor
Best for
Scribewave
Choose Scribewave if you need journalists and researchers transcribing and reviewing interviews across multiple languages — strengths include strong multilingual and dialect coverage with a focus on smaller and regional languages.
ScriptMe
Choose ScriptMe if you need transcribing and subtitling recorded zoom, teams, or goto meetings — strengths include simple upload-based workflow for meeting recordings.
Pros & cons
Scribewave
+ Strong multilingual and dialect coverage with a focus on smaller and regional languages
+ Privacy-focused: European servers, GDPR compliance, and a stated policy of not training models on user content
- Primarily an upload-and-transcribe tool rather than a live meeting bot that joins calls automatically
ScriptMe
+ Simple upload-based workflow for meeting recordings
+ Combines transcription with subtitle export in one tool
- Works from uploaded recordings rather than joining live meetings as a bot
FAQ
Is Scribewave or ScriptMe better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribewave is strong for journalists and researchers transcribing and reviewing interviews across multiple languages, while ScriptMe is strong for transcribing and subtitling recorded zoom, teams, or goto meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribewave and ScriptMe compare on price?
Scribewave is a free tier with paid upgrades and ScriptMe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribewave and ScriptMe?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.