Scriberr and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providersAutomatic speaker diarization (who said what)Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine
Automatic capture and transcription
Standout feature
Automatic speaker diarization (who said what)
AI summaries and action items
Team usage
AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers
Sync notes to docs and task tools
Integrations
Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights
Multi-language support
Languages & capture
Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts
Shareable recaps
Best-fit workflow
Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows
Automatic capture and transcription
Best for
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Pros & cons
Scriberr
+ Fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware
+ MIT-licensed and free to run with no per-minute charges
- Active development was publicly paused by the maintainer, relying on community contributions
timeOS
+ Automates post-meeting follow-up across tools
+ Works across major platforms
- Joins meetings to capture them
FAQ
Is Scriberr or timeOS better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scriberr and timeOS compare on price?
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scriberr and timeOS?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.