Scriberr and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriberr | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Scriberr
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.