Scriberr and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriberr | Skribby |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine | Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet |
| Standout feature | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) | Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts |
| Team usage | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers | Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs) |
| Integrations | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights | Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events |
| Languages & capture | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts | Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support |
| Best-fit workflow | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows | Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings |
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Scriberr
Skribby
It depends on your workflow. Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.