Scriberr and Simon Says are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. Simon Says: AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most, and Simon Says when transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
AI transcription, captioning, and translation built for professional video and audio workflows.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriberr | Simon Says |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine | AI transcription with speaker identification |
| Standout feature | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) | Subtitle and caption generation with visual editing |
| Team usage | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers | Translation across many languages |
| Integrations | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights | Integrations with Final Cut Pro, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid |
| Languages & capture | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts | Support for professional audio and video formats |
| Best-fit workflow | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows | AI transcription with speaker identification |
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Simon Says
Choose Simon Says if you need transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects — strengths include integrates directly with professional video editing software.
Scriberr
Simon Says
It depends on your workflow. Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure, while Simon Says is strong for transcribing and captioning footage for video editing projects. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Simon Says is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.