Scriberr and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriberr: Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriberr when privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI audio transcription app that runs Whisper models locally with speaker diarization, summaries, and chat-with-transcript.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriberr | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local, offline transcription using Whisper models via the WhisperX engine | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | Automatic speaker diarization (who said what) | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | AI summaries with custom prompts via Ollama or OpenAI-compatible providers | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Chat with your transcripts to ask questions and pull insights | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Built-in audio recorder and note-taking on transcripts | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | Folder watcher and API endpoints for automation workflows | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
Scriberr
Choose Scriberr if you need privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure — strengths include fully self-hosted and offline, keeping audio and transcripts on your own hardware.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Scriberr
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. Scriberr is strong for privacy-conscious teams transcribing meeting and interview recordings on their own infrastructure, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriberr is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.