Scriber GPT and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriber GPT: AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriber GPT when transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriber GPT | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI transcription for audio and video across many file formats | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Subtitle export in SRT plus PDF, DOCX, and TXT | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Translation of transcripts while preserving speaker labels and timestamps | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Dedicated interview and webinar transcription workflows | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 90+ languages | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Scriber GPT
Choose Scriber GPT if you need transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers — strengths include covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Scriber GPT
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Scriber GPT is strong for transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.