Scriber GPT and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriber GPT: AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriber GPT when transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export.
AI transcription for audio and video across many file formatsDedicated interview and webinar transcription workflowsSpeaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI transcription for audio and video across many file formats
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Speaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Subtitle export in SRT plus PDF, DOCX, and TXT
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Translation of transcripts while preserving speaker labels and timestamps
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Dedicated interview and webinar transcription workflows
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Support for 90+ languages
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Scriber GPT
Choose Scriber GPT if you need transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers — strengths include covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Scriber GPT
+ Covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output
+ Multiple export formats including subtitle files
- Free tier provides only a limited number of minutes
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Scriber GPT or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scriber GPT is strong for transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scriber GPT and Tana compare on price?
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scriber GPT and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.