Scriber GPT and StreamAlive are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scriber GPT: AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export. StreamAlive: Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scriber GPT when transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers matters most, and StreamAlive when running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export.
Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries.
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Scriber GPT | StreamAlive |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI transcription for audio and video across many file formats | Chat-based audience participation across Zoom, Teams, Meet, and YouTube Live |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps | AI-powered automatic detection and curation of audience questions |
| Team usage | Subtitle export in SRT plus PDF, DOCX, and TXT | AI generation of ready-to-use polls and interactions from a presentation or topic |
| Integrations | Translation of transcripts while preserving speaker labels and timestamps | AI chat summaries with insights and notable quotes |
| Languages & capture | Dedicated interview and webinar transcription workflows | Live polls, word clouds, interactive maps, spinner wheels, and emoji reactions |
| Best-fit workflow | Support for 90+ languages | Post-session analytics and reports |
Scriber GPT
Choose Scriber GPT if you need transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers — strengths include covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output.
StreamAlive
Choose StreamAlive if you need running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings — strengths include designed specifically for engaging large town hall and all-hands audiences.
Scriber GPT
StreamAlive
It depends on your workflow. Scriber GPT is strong for transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers, while StreamAlive is strong for running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades and StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.