Scribbl and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings
Standout feature
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture
Team usage
AI summaries with key points and action items
AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates
Integrations
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans
Languages & capture
Support for many transcription languages
Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions
Best-fit workflow
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Per-user permission management over transcriptions
Best for
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Pros & cons
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
toruno
+ Screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings
+ Backed by Ricoh with enterprise security and administration controls
- Real-time transcription is tied to the Windows desktop app
FAQ
Is Scribbl or toruno better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribbl and toruno compare on price?
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribbl and toruno?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.