Scribbl and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Standout feature
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Team usage
AI summaries with key points and action items
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Integrations
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Languages & capture
Support for many transcription languages
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best-fit workflow
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Best for
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is Scribbl or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribbl and TeamRetro compare on price?
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribbl and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.