Scribbl and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
AI summaries with key points and action items
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Support for many transcription languages
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Scribbl or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Scribbl and Tana compare on price?
Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Scribbl and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.